Recent legal battles have questioned the constitutionality of federal gun laws, raising concerns about the Second Amendment and individual rights. One high-profile case involves the son of President Joe Biden, who is facing possession of an illegal firearm charge, putting the President in a difficult position as he simultaneously advocates for stricter gun laws.
The Law in Question
The central law at the heart of these legal battles is 18 USC 922.
It is primarily used to prevent convicted felons from owning firearms.
However, this code section also contains lesser-known provisions prohibiting gun possession for various reasons.
The President’s Son
Hunter Biden, for example, faces charges under a provision that forbids individuals addicted to narcotics from owning firearms.
He is accused of providing false information about his addiction on a federal form and possessing a Colt Cobra 38SPL.
He could face up to 25 years in prison if convicted on all counts.
In the face of these charges, Hunter Biden’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, says, “We believe these charges are barred by the agreement the prosecutors made with Mr. Biden, the recent rulings by several federal courts that this statute is unconstitutional, and the facts that he did not violate that law, and we plan to demonstrate all of that in court.”
In a case in Oklahoma, a defendant faced charges similar to Hunter Biden’s.
However, a federal judge dismissed the case, deeming the law “unconstitutionally vague” and suggesting that authorities should have charged the defendant differently.
Supreme Court’s Role
The ultimate resolution of these legal disputes may rest with the U.S. Supreme Court, which will soon hear arguments on another provision of the same statute.
This provision stops individuals under court restraining orders for domestic violence from possessing firearms, and the court found that the provision “fails to pass constitutional muster.”
A Unique Situation
One unique aspect of these legal challenges is the involvement of the President’s son, Hunter Biden.
William Devaney, a former federal prosecutor now practicing at Baker McKenzie, says, “We could have the odd situation of the son of a president who is calling for stricter gun laws challenging these charges as violating his Second Amendment rights.”
Defendants and Personal Beliefs
However, William Devaney also commented on Hunter Biden’s case, “Like any criminal defendant, he’s going to use the laws and the arguments available to him, regardless of what his personal beliefs may or may not be.”
A New Decision
The uncertainty surrounding which gun laws will stand or fall stems from a 2022 Supreme Court decision known as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.
This decision overturned a long-standing New York law. It set a legal standard for lower courts to say a gun law must align with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.
The government argues that restrictions on gun possession are a legitimate way to reduce violence.
The Biden administration has proposed rules to tighten regulations on firearm sales, mainly focusing on closing the “gun show loophole” and “Internet loophole.”
Ultimately, Biden’s proposals hope to increase background checks for gun buyers.
President Biden has also called for the revival of a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, reflecting his commitment to gun control measures.
As the Supreme Court takes up these matters, several potential outcomes exist.
The court may uphold the statute, supporting its role in disarming individuals facing domestic violence restraining orders.
Alternatively, the court could provide guidance on which offenses warrant restrictions on gun possession and which do not.
Still in Trouble
However, even if certain restrictions are overturned, Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, thinks that Hunter Biden is still “in trouble no matter what.”
False Statements on Gun Forms
Gottlieb thinks the court is unlikely to overturn a law prohibiting false statements on gun forms, as it would have broader implications beyond this specific case, stating, “I don’t see the court ever taking that away.”
This Business Put up a “No Gen Z’s Allowed” Sign, and the Gen Z’s Are Furious
A small business owner has gone viral on Twitter for posting a sign in his shop window berating Gen Z cashiers, claiming that he had to close because his cashiers quit as he didn’t let their boyfriends stand around with them all shift. This Business Put up a “No Gen Z’s Allowed” Sign, and the Gen Z’s Are Furious
President Biden Sniffs Child in an Incident That’s Been Branded “Quite Strange”
Criticism floods in as President Joe Biden’s recent interaction with a young girl at Helsinki Airport raises eyebrows and leaves many questioning his behavior and ability to lead. President Biden Sniffs Child in an Incident That’s Been Branded “Quite Strange”
Biden Is an “International Joke” – An Embarrassing Moment for an Octogenarian President?
Recently, a false claim has been making the rounds that Biden made embarrassing remarks about curing cancer. We dig into what was reported vs. what actually happened. Biden Is an “International Joke” – An Embarrassing Moment for an Octogenarian President?
Foreign Migrants Are OVERFLOWING in NYC – Who’s to Blame?
Migrants are being transported to cities across the nation, and there isn’t enough housing or shelter to hold everyone. Foreign Migrants Are OVERFLOWING in NYC – Who’s to Blame?
Florida Is Banning Transgender People From Schools: Trans Teachers and Students Are Now Back in the Closet, by Law
The Orange County Public Schools, one of the largest and most prominent school districts in Florida, recently made headlines with the issuance of new guidelines that have stirred significant controversy. Here’s the full story. Florida Is Banning Transgender People From Schools: Trans Teachers and Students Are Now Back in the Closet, by Law
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Steve Allen. The people shown in the images are for illustrative purposes only, not the actual people featured in the story.